Friday, June 12, 2015

Making Choosing Easier

Introduction

This week’s MSLD632 Blog centers on one of my favorite TED video speakers, Sheena Iynegar. In the video, How to Make Choosing Easier, Sheena is brilliant in illustrating four methods of how we can make choosing an easier and more successful experience. This blog will identify all four and will related them to my own decision-making in the context of organizational decisions.


Choices and Decisions

                     So far in MSLD521 the focus has been on decision-making. Module 1 featured Dan Gilbert’s video, Why We Make Bad Decisions, and the first readings in our text book have all centered on the concept of decision-making. After viewing Sheena’s video, I began a quest of nailing down the difference between decision-making and choosing.  After several hours of reviewing all the material a conclusion was reached that choices are a component of decisions and decisions are typically associated with failure or success. Choices seem to be at a very micro or zoomed in level (decisions are a compilation of choices) and decisions seem to be more related to a bigger picture. In Sheena’s video, three of the four methodologies remain at a very zoomed in or micro level. The fourth methodology zooms out and involves a multi-layered group of individual choices.  The importance of understanding the difference between choices and decisions, as it applies to a business setting, may seem trivial, but don’t underestimate one of Sheena’s methods of making choosing easier. Pay attention as you read each of the four methods and see if you can identify the difference between choices and decisions.

          

1st Method - Cut

         
            The very first and easiest method of simplifying choices that Sheena discusses is cutting down options when there are too many. So, just how many are too many? Well Sheena does not provide any criteria that suggests how to distinguish between too many options versus just the right amount of options. What she does do however is use compelling examples to illustrate her point:
Now if you do the math, people were at least six times more likely to buy a jar of jam if they encountered six (jars of jam) than if they encountered 24…When Proctor & Gamble went from 26 different kinds of Head & Shoulders to 15, they saw an increase in sales by 10 percent. When the Golden Cat Corporation got rid of their 10 worst-selling cat litter products, they saw an increase in profits by 87 percent -- a function of both increase in sales and lowering of costs.” (Iynegar, 2011).
A daily function at my workplace is sorting, filtering and discarding unwanted data that left unsorted and unfiltered would make-decisions wildly inaccurate because the data group will be used to make future multi-layered decisions. The difference between Sheena’s example and my example is that in my example I have to make a choice and this choice is a “burden” (Tech.pinions, 2014, para. 3). In Sheena’s example choice is optional, the impact does not have any depth, and has no burden.


2nd Method - Concretization

         
This second method is an easy one for most of us credit card users to identify with. Concretization is simply making sure that you visualize your choices with concrete or tangible objects. Sheena uses a very powerful example that we can all relate to, that is if you’re not living under a rock somewhere “Why do people spend an average of 15 to 30 percent more when they use an ATM care or a credit card as opposed to cash? Because it doesn’t feel like real money.” (Iyengar, 2011).
By using concrete objects, Sheena claims that we take making choices a little more seriously. My experience tells me she is spot-on. In the late 1990s personal debit grew to the point of making a choice to work three jobs in order to alleviate the crushing debt caused by using plastic too much. During this time we paid cash for everything. At the time, making the purchases on credit did not seem to have a burden associated it. While Gilbert (2008) does not have an example that is clear example of this one, clearly an underestimation of value (or in this case impact) of using the plastic had taken place.

3rd Method – Grouping (Categorizing)

         
“We can handle more categories than we can handle choices…Because categories help me tell them apart” (Iyengar, 2010). This is a method used almost daily to complete routine tasks at my place of work. After filtering and sorting has taken place (1st method of cutting) we group over six-thousand fault messages into approximately 80 fault message groups. Grouping like fault messages together allows us to distinguish the differences between groups and not be overwhelmed by the quantity of six-thousand fault messages, just as Sheena asserts.


4th  Method – Condition for Complexity

         
Sheena’s last method of making choosing easier is confronting a choice that is complex “I’m going to show you one example of what I’m talking about. Let’s take a very, very complicated decision: buying a car.” (Iyengar, 2011). Sounds like a decision that can have a burden associated with it doesn’t it? Sheena explains that there are about 60 different choice packages to perform to build a car from scratch. Everything from selecting the colors (56 choices) to engine and transmission types (four each). Sheena asserts that people are more successful in beginning with the groups that have a few choices (such as the engine and transmission type) and working up to the more complex choices of selecting color (56 choices). Working from simple to complex ideas / tasks is a successful strategy in teaching and makes sense this strategy would apply to making choices, especially when they are multi-layered and become decisions.

Summary

         
So, did you come to the conclusion that choices that have a burden associated to them are special choices that we call decisions? Honestly, if you are not convinced it would not be a surprise. The support in this blog for such an assertion is not overwhelming and there does not seem to be an abundance of available material online that focuses on the difference between choices and decisions. This will be an area of focus to pay attention to as the class progresses.

References:
Gilbert, D. (2008, Dec). Why we make bad decisions [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks (Links to an external site.)/dan_gilbert_researches_happiness#t-488159.

Iyengar, S. (2011, Nov). How to make choosing easier. [Video file]. Retrieved from  http://www.ted.com/talks/sheena_iyengar_choosing_what_to_choose/transcript?language=en#t-99000. 

Tech.pinions: Snippet: Design is the difference between choice and decision (2014). Chatham: Newstex. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1641752467?accountid=27203